All people should have the right to worship any religion they want, as long as their religious standards are not imposed on others. In order to ensure this freedom of and from religion, we must have a complete separation of church and state.
A limited government, with no ability to legislate morality, is essential if citizens are free to practice their religion. The government has no role in funding, supporting, or regulating issues on based on religious grounds.
What is a crime? How do libertarians believe ...
What are borders, and how do we interact with the p...
How do libertarians propose the government collect ...
How would libertarianism provide for better health ...
Pro Choice or Life? What is the libertarian s...
Would the environment be protected in a libertarian...
What do libertarians believe is necessary to stimul...
How would libertarians keep consumers safe? W...
Who should educate our children – and about w...
What does a fair political process look like? ...
How would libertarians deal other countries in peac...
How would citizens be allowed to worship in a liber...
How would libertarians uphold or regulate speech an...
What is the libertarian belief on the 2nd
What do libertarians want to ensure innovation and ...
What role does government have in defining and prom...
How would libertarians ensure the national defense?...
How does freedom best support and protect working p...
What is money, and what role does the government ha...
How does individual freedom interact with National ...
What role does government and society play in...
What do libertarians believe is the role of governm...
For the good of the state and of the church, the government should play no role in religion, and religion should play no role in government.
Dave Nalle, Republican Liberty Caucus
I believe in freedom of anything peaceful including religion, art, singing, dancing, whatever.
Tibor Machman, Chapman University
The use of private property to practice religion and worship is fully acceptable and any constraint on such peaceful pursuits is illegitimate. This would include the provision that government property cannot be used for, neutral, or against any religious practice because any such use would involve compulsion in the acquisition, operations, and funding of the property.
David Theroux, The Independent Institute
Religion is silly, but people should certainly believe what they wish.
Doug Casey, Casey Research
All religious displays are expressions of opinion, and not objects for suppression. If schools were not government-owned and operated school officials could and would include any religious statements they wished, and there would be zero controversy. The problem, again, is the government’s dominance in the school systems and economy.
Richard Timberlake, University of Georgia
Freedom of religion must be total and unqualified in the private sector. Government should not in any way discriminate in its own policies in terms of religion, but it should also get out of areas like education where it only creates intractable and unsolvable religious controversies. When people can freely walk away from an environment they disapprove, including withdrawing their financial support for it, then these controversies evaporate.
Lawrence W. Reed, Foundation for Economic Education